- Coinbase pushes for transparency as SEC documents reveal internal debates on Ethereum 2.0’s status
- Paul Grewal demands full disclosure on SEC’s decision-making after Ethereum’s shift to proof-of-stake
- Crypto industry watches as FOIA lawsuit unfolds, potentially influencing future regulatory frameworks
Ethereum 2.0—also known as Ethereum’s transition into a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism—marked a major upgrade for the blockchain network. The decision to abandon proof-of-work while aiming to improve Ethereum’s scalability, security, and energy efficiency was set to transform the project into a greener, more efficient, and more attractive option for long-term investors.
However, ‘The Merge’ also kick-started the long-running debate of whether altcoins should be classified as securities or another type of asset class by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
If deemed a security, Ethereum would fall under strict regulatory oversight, impacting how exchanges like Coinbase offer the asset to investors. The SEC launched an investigation into Ethereum 2.0, but kept many of its internal discussions confidential, raising concerns over regulatory transparency.
Why This Matters for Coinbase
As one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges and one of the most popular in the U.S., Coinbase is among the crypto firms that stood their ground against what many deemed “regulation by enforcement” by Gary Gensler’s SEC.
The company argued that the Commission’s inconsistent classification of cryptocurrencies was harmful. As a major marketplace for Ethereum, Coinbase was also heavily affected by the SEC’s prosecution of altcoins like Ether or XRP.
In response, Coinbase’s legal team has pursued a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the SEC to uncover internal documents discussing Ethereum 2.0. And apparently, the discovery phase is already uncovering substantial information about the SEC’s attacks on Ethereum post-merge.
Paul Grewal’s Push for Transparency
Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, Paul Grewal, recently shared important updates regarding the FOIA case. On a Twitter post published this morning, Grewal revealed that the SEC had a series of internal documents related to Ethereum 2.0’s classification, including:
- A May 2022 analysis applying the Howey Test to Ethereum 2.0.
- A February 2023 email explicitly questioning whether Ethereum is a security.
- An April 2023 memorandum that may have influenced the SEC’s decision to authorize the ETH 2.0 investigation.
- Several 2024 emails discussing different legal approaches to Ethereum’s classification.
On the same Post, Grewal pushed the SEC to release these documents, arguing that the Commission’s lack of transparency when it comes to crypto-related legal battles significantly undermines trust in digital asset regulations.
What’s Next?
Earlier this year, the SEC dropped accusations on Coinbase that alleged the CEX was operating as an unregistered securities broker in the United States. Meanwhile, the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit is still ongoing.
The outcome of Coinbase’s FOIA lawsuit could have major implications for crypto regulation in the U.S. Since Gensler stepped down in January, the SEC has been pushing for the creation of a new regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies.
If these documents reveal an inconsistent approach by the Commission, it could fuel even more calls for quicker regulatory reform.
Did you hear about WEEX’s Ferrari giveaway? Trade and complete tasks to compete for a Ferrari and other amazing rewards! The event runs until April 30, 2025, so join the battle and start trading today.
